General information

Announcements(0)

Timetable

Sun. Jul 12, 2020

Mon. Jul 13, 2020

Tue. Jul 14, 2020

Wed. Jul 15, 2020

Program

Sessions

Search presentations

Download PDF for print

icon_20260605203458381.png

Change account information such as the email address and password on the account setting screen common to Confit.

Login required to view

Password required to view

Presentation Information

Session Details

To browse or post comments, you must log in.

You cannot post comments as it is outside the comment posting period.

This comment has been deleted. You cannot reply to this comment.

Program Type

Announcements

Profile management

Bookmark

Panel Discussion of the Session

This session will be consisted from presesntations of invited speakers and panel discussion. Invited speakers and Ms. Nobuko Miyairi who is the ex president of ORCID Asia-Pacific, and Prof. Hodaka Kawahata who is the presiden of JpGU will make a active discussion with the floor participants based on questioner.

Scientific indices such as the number of citations or impact factor have been widely adopted in Japan and elsewhere to gauge scientific outputs without sufficient deliberations on their relationships to the true value of science and researchers' efforts or the harm and perverse incentives that result. If such disconnect exists, overreliance to these indices may lead to biases in research including in aiming for shorter-term goals. They are often requested by the solution-seeking stakeholders as well.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In the field of geoscience, a wide latitude of research styles exists and forms our community, from a focus on urgent societal needs to intellectual curiosity about our Earth. Such characteristics vary among fields making general comparisons across fields not straightforward. The adoption of simple evaluation indices as above may hinder the truly useful assessment of research. This trend influences gravely the research environment and thus the behavior of early-career researchers. What is the right direction for science and how should science be assessed?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In this session, we invite the members of the geoscience research community to discuss "ideal" science, recognize its diversity and identify the needs for changes. We welcome reports from different parts of the world and novel ideas to evaluate our own research activities that may lead to creating a culture that fulfills accountability to society. We envision this session to have infuse lively discussion and invite the audience to interactive exchanges.

JpGU-AGU Joint Meeting 2020

Presentation Information

[U02-03]Panel Discussion of the Session

Keywords: